Clement Nderitu v ARM Cement Limited [2020] eKLR Case Summary

Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Category
Civil
Judge(s)
Judge Radido Stephen
Judgment Date
October 02, 2020
Country
Kenya
Document Type
PDF
Number of Pages
3
Explore the case summary of Clement Nderitu v ARM Cement Limited [2020] eKLR, detailing key legal principles and implications. Get insights into recent legal judgments today.

Case Brief: Clement Nderitu v ARM Cement Limited [2020] eKLR

1. Case Information:
- Name of the Case: Clement Nderitu v. ARM Cement Limited
- Case Number: Cause No. 1668 of 2015
- Court: Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Date Delivered: 2nd October 2020
- Category of Law: Civil
- Judge(s): Judge Radido Stephen
- Country: Kenya

2. Questions Presented:
The central legal issue in this case revolves around whether the Claimant, Clement Nderitu, can continue legal proceedings against ARM Cement Limited, which had been placed under administration, without the consent of the administrator or the approval of the court, as stipulated by section 560 of the Insolvency Act.

3. Facts of the Case:
Clement Nderitu (Claimant) initiated legal action against ARM Cement Limited (Respondent) on 21 September 2015, asserting that his employment had been unfairly and unlawfully terminated. On 17 August 2018, ARM Cement Limited was placed under administration in accordance with section 560 of the Insolvency Act. Subsequently, on 29 June 2020, the Respondent filed a Notice of Preliminary Objection, arguing that the Claimant's case should be stayed until compliance with the Insolvency Act's requirements was achieved.

4. Procedural History:
The case progressed through the Employment and Labour Relations Court, where initial filings and submissions were made. The Respondent filed its preliminary objection on 29 June 2020, and the court issued directions on 30 June 2020. The Respondent submitted their objections on 24 August 2020, while the Claimant failed to submit their responses by the directed deadline of 10 July 2020. The court considered the submissions and the objection raised by the Respondent.

5. Analysis:
Rules:
The court focused on section 560(1)(d) of the Insolvency Act, which stipulates that legal proceedings against a company under administration can only proceed with the administrator's consent or court approval. This provision was critical in determining whether the Claimant could continue his case.

Case Law:
The court did not cite specific previous cases in the ruling, but the principles underlying the Insolvency Act and the restrictions it places on legal actions against companies under administration were clearly implied. The court's analysis would be informed by precedents that emphasize the need to respect the processes established for companies undergoing financial distress.

Application:
In its reasoning, the court noted that the Claimant was aware of the Respondent's administrative status but failed to demonstrate any attempt to obtain the necessary consent from the administrator or court approval to continue the proceedings. Consequently, the court upheld the Respondent's preliminary objection, concluding that the Claimant's case could not proceed until the proper legal channels were followed.

6. Conclusion:
The court ruled in favor of the Respondent, ordering that the Claimant's case be stayed until further directions were provided. This decision underscores the importance of adhering to the provisions of the Insolvency Act, particularly regarding the restrictions on legal actions against companies in administration.

7. Dissent:
There was no dissenting opinion noted in this case.

8. Summary:
The Employment and Labour Relations Court's ruling in Clement Nderitu v. ARM Cement Limited highlights the legal limitations imposed by the Insolvency Act on continuing legal proceedings against companies under administration. The court's decision to stay the proceedings until proper consent or approval is obtained reflects the necessity of following statutory requirements in insolvency situations, reinforcing the legal framework designed to protect companies undergoing financial distress.

Document Summary

Below is the summary preview of this document.

  • Clement-Nderitu-v-ARM-Cement-Limited-[2020]-eKLR-Case-Summary_2258_0.jpg

This is the end of the summary preview.

Related Documents

View all summaries